Category: Home

Antiviral defense system

Antiviral defense system

Antiviarl generally, genera without any Energy-boosting supplements very few Antivral correspond to genera Energy-boosting supplements bacteria that sgstem obligate Antiviral defense system Citrus aurantium for menopause support endosymbiont Supplementary Data 9. Energy-boosting supplements virulent phages evade AbiT, Obesity prevention Abi system defende molecular mechanism remains unknown Labrie et al. However, it cannot be excluded that the Sendai virus induced—IFNs represent a mixture of several type I IFNs that is more efficient than the rat recombinant IFN α protein used alone. Millman A. The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research projects nos. This could be explained by the intracellular lifestyle of such bacteria.

Antiviral defense system -

MacSyFinder: a program to mine genomes for molecular systems with an application to CRISPR-Cas systems. PLoS ONE. Russel J. CRISPRCasTyper: automated identification, annotation, and classification of CRISPR-Cas loci. CRISPR J. Identification of protein secretion systems in bacterial genomes.

Burroughs A. Two novel PIWI families: roles in inter-genomic conflicts in bacteria and Mediator-dependent modulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Mestre M. Systematic prediction of genes functionally associated with bacterial retrons and classification of the encoded tripartite systems.

Rousset F. Phages and their satellites encode hotspots of antiviral systems. Couvin D. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. El-Gebali S. et al. The Pfam protein families database in Shmakov S.

Systematic prediction of genes functionally linked to CRISPR-Cas systems by gene neighborhood analysis. Galperin M. Microbial genome analysis: the COG approach.

Makarova K. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR—Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Edgar R.

MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Eddy S. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Prokaryotic viperins produce diverse antiviral molecules. Doron S. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome.

Gao L. Diverse enzymatic activities mediate antiviral immunity in prokaryotes. Goldfarb T. BREX is a novel phage resistance system widespread in microbial genomes. EMBO J. Johnson A. Bacterial gasdermins reveal an ancient mechanism of cell death.

Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are predicted to function as key components of a novel system of defense against mobile genetic elements.

Millman A. Diversity and classification of cyclic-oligonucleotide-based anti-phage signalling systems. Ofir G. DISARM is a widespread bacterial defence system with broad anti-phage activities. Roberts R. REBASE—a database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes.

Shah S. Comprehensive search for accessory proteins encoded with archaeal and bacterial type III CRISPR-cas gene cassettes reveals 39 new cas gene families.

RNA Biol. Antiviral defense via nucleotide depletion in bacteria. Cyclic CMP and cyclic UMP mediate bacterial immunity against phages. Thiaville J. Novel genomic island modifies DNA with 7-deazaguanine derivatives. Tong T. Occurrence, evolution, and functions of DNA phosphorothioate epigenetics in bacteria.

Wang S. SspABCD-SspFGH constitutes a new type of DNA phosphorothioate-based bacterial defense system. Xiong L. A new type of DNA phosphorothioation-based antiviral system in archaea. Xiong X. SspABCD—SspE is a phosphorothioation-sensing bacterial defence system with broad anti-phage activities.

A novel host-specific restriction system associated with DNA backbone S-modification in Salmonella. Yuan Y. Zeng Z. A short prokaryotic argonaute cooperates with membrane effector to confer antiviral defense.

Anba J. Characterization of the lactococcal abiD1 gene coding for phage abortive infection. Bergsland K. A site in the T4 bacteriophage major head protein gene that can promote the inhibition of all translation in Escherichia coli.

Birkholz N. A mobile restriction—modification system provides phage defence and resolves an epigenetic conflict with an antagonistic endonuclease.

Bouchard J. Characterization of the two-component abortive phage infection mechanism AbiT from Lactococcus lactis. Cluzel P.

Phage abortive infection mechanism from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, expression of which is mediated by an Iso-ISS1 element. Cram D. Molecular analysis of F plasmid pif region specifying abortive infection of T7 phage.

Dai G. Molecular characterization of a new abortive infection system AbiU from Lactococcus lactis LL Deng Y. Genetic organization and functional analysis of a novel phage abortive infection system, AbiL, from Lactococcus lactis.

A novel plasmid-encoded phage abortive infection system from Lactococcus lactis biovar. FEMS Microbiol. Dinsmore P. Phenotypic consequences of altering the copy number of abiA, a gene responsible for aborting bacteriophage infections in Lactococcus lactis. Domingues S.

The lactococcal abortive phage infection system AbiP prevents both phage DNA replication and temporal transcription switch. Durmaz E. Molecular characterization of a second abortive phage resistance gene present in Lactococcus lactis subsp.

lactis ME2. A widespread bacteriophage abortive infection system functions through a type IV toxin—antitoxin mechanism. Emond E. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the bacteriophage abortive infection mechanism AbiK from Lactococcus lactis.

AbiQ, an abortive infection mechanism from Lactococcus lactis. Garvey P. Cloning and DNA sequence analysis of two abortive infection phage resistance determinants from the lactococcal plasmid pNP Jabbar M.

Genetic and physiological studies of an Escherichia coli locus that restricts polynucleotide kinase- and RNA ligase-deficient mutants of bacteriophage T4. Lindahl G. Bacteriophage lambda; abortive infection of bacteria lysogenic for phage P2.

McLandsborough L. Cloning and characterization of the abortive infection genetic determinant abiD isolated from pBF61 of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis KR5. Bacterial retrons function in anti-phage defense.

AbiG, a genotypically novel abortive infection mechanism encoded by plasmid pCI of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris UC Owen S. Prophages encode phage-defense systems with cognate self-immunity. Cell Host Microbe. Parma D. The Rex system of bacteriophage lambda: tolerance and altruistic cell death.

Genes Dev. Parreira R. Dramatic decay of phage transcripts in lactococcal cells carrying the abortive infection determinant AbiB. Prévots F. Complete sequence of the new lactococcal abortive phage resistance gene abiO. Dairy Sci. Cloning and sequencing of the novel abortive infection gene abiH of Lactococcus lactis ssp.

lactis biovar. diacetylactis S Nucleotide sequence and analysis of the new chromosomal abortive infection gene abiN of Lactococcus lactis subsp.

cremoris S Sberro H. Smith H. Abortive infection of shigella dysenteriae P2 by T2 bacteriophage. Isolation, cloning and characterisation of the abiI gene from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis M encoding abortive phage infection. Biswas A. CRISPRDetect: a flexible algorithm to define CRISPR arrays.

BMC Genomics. Nawrocki E. Infernal 1. Haft D. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Tatusova T. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Cock P. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics.

Hyatt D. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. Zimmermann L. A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. Jumper J. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.

Mirdita M. ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. First, fundamental research into interactions between phages and bacterial hosts expanded biotechnology tools and helped evolve and screen phages or strains with designated resistance, which have underpinned the development of many fields, including but not limited to gene editing Adli, ; Manghwar et al.

Secondly, another exciting discovery is that a variety of defense proteins of the human innate immune system have direct homologs in bacteria Wein and Sorek, Evolutionary conservatism has brought some functional similarities, enabling researchers to decipher the eukaryotic immune mechanism in a relatively simple bacteria-phage experimental model and reveal unprecedented potential therapeutic targets.

One area that requires substantial attention is how bacterial defense systems sense phage infection. Characterization of the activation mode of the immune system lags far behind the identification of new immune systems. Understanding how the immune systems sense invasive MGEs is of great significance for phage-based antibacterial treatments, which will help to genetically modify phages and help them bypass the immune recognition of pathogens.

Moreover, most of the studies on defense systems have rarely or limited consideration of other co-existing anti-phage mechanisms. A variety of defense systems are clustered in the defense islands and provide abundant resistance against phages.

The priority of their activation must be strictly regulated and the conditions for bacteria to prefer different resistance mechanisms are not fully studied. For example, the systems that respond to the invasion through the Abi mechanism make biological sense only when the phage reaches a stage as late as possible of its infection cycle or when other mechanisms are insufficient to deal with the threat, just like PrrC and Retrons Amitsur et al.

How do the first lines of defense, non-Abi systems work synergistically in the same bacterial cell Dupuis et al. The effects of conjoint resistance mechanisms on phage population and evolution have rarely been assessed. Furthermore, beyond the individual range, from the perspective of bacteria and bacteriophage communities, the cooperation between individuals should be further studied Borges et al.

Genes without functional annotations but clustered next to genes with clear anti-defense functions may also encode anti-defense proteins.

These unknown genes within these regions may provide a wide range of regulatory tools to help us better tame the bacterial defense systems. ZG: writing — original draft.

YF: writing — review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China YFC and YFC to YF. Beijing Nova Program , the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities QNTD The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abedon, S. Use of phage therapy to treat long-standing, persistent, or chronic bacterial infections. Drug Deliv. doi: PubMed Abstract CrossRef Full Text Google Scholar. Ablasser, A. cGAS in action: expanding roles in immunity and inflammation. Science eaat Nature , — Adli, M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond.

CrossRef Full Text Google Scholar. Alawneh, A. An ADP-ribosyltransferase alt of bacteriophage T4 negatively regulates the Escherichia coli MazF toxin of a toxin-antitoxin module. Amitsur, M. HSD restriction-modification proteins partake in latent anticodon nuclease. EMBO J.

In vitro reconstitution of anticodon nuclease from components encoded by phage T4 and Escherichia coli CTr5X. Andriianov, A. Phage T3 overcomes the BREX defence through SAM cleavage and inhibition of SAM synthesis. bioRxiv Antine, S.

Structural basis of Gabija anti-phage defense and viral immune evasion. Appasani, K. Bacteriophage T4 gp2 interferes with cell viability and with bacteriophage lambda red recombination.

Athukoralage, J. An anti-CRISPR viral ring nuclease subverts type III CRISPR immunity. Bair, C. A type IV modification dependent restriction nuclease that targets glucosylated hydroxymethyl cytosine modified DNAs. Barrangou, R. A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications.

Bernheim, A. Prokaryotic viperins produce diverse antiviral molecules. The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource. Bickle, T. Biology of DNA restriction. Bidnenko, E. Activation of mRNA translation by phage protein and low temperature: the case of Lactococcus lactis abortive infection system AbiD1.

BMC Mol. Bingham, R. The major head protein of bacteriophage T4 binds specifically to elongation factor Tu. Blower, T. Viral evasion of a bacterial suicide system by RNA-based molecular mimicry enables infectious altruism. PLoS Genet.

Bobay, L. Manipulating or superseding host recombination functions: a dilemma that shapes phage evolvability. Bobonis, J. Bacterial retrons encode phage-defending tripartite toxin-antitoxin systems.

Bondy-Denomy, J. Borges, A. The discovery, mechanisms, and evolutionary impact of anti-CRISPRs. Ann Rev Virol 4, 37— Bacteriophage cooperation suppresses CRISPR-Cas3 and Cas9 immunity.

Cells , — Bouchard, J. Lactococcal phage genes involved in sensitivity to AbiK and their relation to single-strand annealing proteins. Burroughs, A.

Identification of uncharacterized components of prokaryotic immune systems and their diverse eukaryotic reformulations. Champness, W. The gol site: a cis-acting bacteriophage T4 regulatory region that can affect expression of all the T4 late genes. Chan, W. Keeping the wolves at bay: antitoxins of prokaryotic type II toxin-antitoxin systems.

Chen, B. Environmental T4-family bacteriophages evolve to escape abortive infection via multiple routes in a bacterial host employing "altruistic suicide" through type III toxin-antitoxin systems.

Cheng, K. A conformational switch in response to chi converts RecBCD from phage destruction to DNA repair. Christensen, S. Overproduction of the Lon protease triggers inhibition of translation in Escherichia coli : involvement of the yefM-yoeB toxin-antitoxin system.

RelE, a global inhibitor of translation, is activated during nutritional stress. Cohen, D. Cyclic GMP-AMP signalling protects bacteria against viral infection. Court, R. The crystal structure of lambda-gam protein suggests a model for RecBCD inhibition.

de La Campa, A. Proteins encoded by the DpnI restriction gene cassette. Hyperproduction and characterization of the DpnI endonuclease.

Dedrick, R. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Deveau, H. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. Dillingham, M. RecBCD enzyme and the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks.

Domingo-Calap, P. Social bacteriophages. Microorganisms Dong, L. An anti-CRISPR protein disables type V Cas12a by acetylation. Dong, D. Structural basis of CRISPR-SpyCas9 inhibition by an anti-CRISPR protein.

Doron, S. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome. Science eaar Drozdz, M. Novel non-specific DNA adenine methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res. Dupuis, M.

CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification systems are compatible and increase phage resistance. Engelberg-Kulka, H. rexB of bacteriophage lambda is an anti-cell death gene. Farasat, I. PLoS Comput. Fatma, S.

Felice, F. Restriction enzymes and their use in molecular biology: an overview. Fitzgerald, K. Toll-like receptors and the control of immunity. Folimonova, S. Superinfection exclusion is an active virus-controlled function that requires a specific viral protein.

Forsberg, K. The novel anti-CRISPR AcrIIA22 relieves DNA torsion in target plasmids and impairs SpyCas9 activity. PLoS Biol. Fu, Y. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells.

Gao, L. Diverse enzymatic activities mediate antiviral immunity in prokaryotes. Science , — Prokaryotic innate immunity through pattern recognition of conserved viral proteins. Science eabm Gao, Z. Anti-CRISPR protein AcrIF4 inhibits the type I-F CRISPR-Cas surveillance complex by blocking nuclease recruitment and DNA cleavage.

Garb, J. Goldfarb, T. BREX is a novel phage resistance system widespread in microbial genomes. Gordeeva, J. BREX system of Escherichia coli distinguishes self from non-self by methylation of a specific DNA site. Günthert, U. Bacillus subtilis phage SPR codes for a DNA methyltransferase with triple sequence specificity.

Haaber, J. Identification and characterization of the phage gene sav, involved in sensitivity to the lactococcal abortive infection mechanism AbiV. Lactococcal abortive infection protein AbiV interacts directly with the phage protein SaV and prevents translation of phage proteins.

Hampton, H. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Harrington, L. A broad-spectrum inhibitor of CRISPR-Cas9. Hattman, S. Hill, C. In vivo genetic exchange of a functional domain from a type II a methylase between lactococcal plasmid pTR and a virulent bacteriophage.

Hilliard, J. Isolation and characterization of the phage T4 PinA protein, an inhibitor of the ATP-dependent lon protease of Escherichia coli. Ho, C. The T4 phage DNA mimic protein Arn inhibits the DNA binding activity of the bacterial histone-like protein H-NS.

Hobbs, S. Phage anti-CBASS and anti-Pycsar nucleases subvert bacterial immunity. Huiting, E. Bacteriophages inhibit and evade cGAS-like immune function in bacteria. Iida, S. Two DNA antirestriction systems of bacteriophage P1, darA, and darB: characterization of darA- phages.

Virology , — Imai, S. Sir2: an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase that connects chromatin silencing, metabolism, and aging. Cold Spring Harb. Isaev, A. Phage T7 DNA mimic protein Ocr is a potent inhibitor of BREX defence. Ivanov, I. Cas9 interrogates DNA in discrete steps modulated by mismatches and supercoiling.

Jaskólska, M. Two defence systems eliminate plasmids from seventh pandemic Vibrio cholerae. Jenson, J. Ubiquitin-like conjugation by bacterial cGAS enhances anti-phage defence. Jia, N. Structure-based functional mechanisms and biotechnology applications of anti-CRISPR proteins.

Cell Biol. Johnson, A. Bacterial gasdermins reveal an ancient mechanism of cell death. Kibby, E. Bacterial NLR-related proteins protect against phage. Cell , — Kim, B. Nucleotide sequence and revised map location of the arn gene from bacteriophage T4.

Cells 7, — PubMed Abstract Google Scholar. King, G. Restriction alleviation and modification enhancement by the Rac prophage of Escherichia coli K Ko, T.

Crystal structure and functional implication of bacterial STING. Koga, M. Escherichia coli rnlA and rnlB compose a novel toxin-antitoxin system.

Genetics , — Kolesnik, M. Type III CRISPR-Cas systems: deciphering the Most complex prokaryotic immune system. Biochemistry Mosc 86, — Krüger, D.

The significance of distance and orientation of restriction endonuclease recognition sites in viral DNA genomes. FEMS Microbiol. Avoidance of DNA methylation. A virus-encoded methylase inhibitor and evidence for counterselection of methylase recognition sites in viral genomes. Cell Biophys.

Labrie, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Involvement of the major capsid protein and two early-expressed phage genes in the activity of the lactococcal abortive infection mechanism AbiT.

Lau, R. Structure and mechanism of a cyclic trinucleotide-activated bacterial endonuclease mediating bacteriophage immunity. Cell 77, — Leavitt, A. Viruses inhibit TIR gcADPR signalling to overcome bacterial defence. Ledvina, H. An E1-E2 fusion protein primes antiviral immune signalling in bacteria.

Lehnherr, H. Addiction protein Phd of plasmid prophage P1 is a substrate of the ClpXP serine protease of Escherichia coli. Leipe, D. STAND, a class of P-loop NTPases including animal and plant regulators of programmed cell death: multiple, complex domain architectures, unusual phyletic patterns, and evolution by horizontal gene transfer.

Leroux, M. The DarTG toxin-antitoxin system provides phage defence by ADP-ribosylating viral DNA. Lin, P. CRISPR-Cas13 inhibitors block RNA editing in Bacteria and mammalian cells. Cell 78, — Liu, J. Post-translational modification control of innate immunity.

Immunity 45, 15— Loenen, W. Modification enhancement by the restriction alleviation protein Ral of bacteriophage lambda. The other face of restriction: modification-dependent enzymes. Lopatina, A. Abortive infection: bacterial suicide as an antiviral immune strategy.

Annu Rev Virol 7, — Lowey, B. Cells , 38— Lu, M. Superinfection exclusion by T-even-type coliphages. Trends Microbiol. As a first approach, we initially thought of using immunohistochemical techniques to establish the cellular topography of expression of these proteins. This enzyme requires double-stranded RNA ds RNA , the usual replicating intermediate of RNA viruses, as activator Sen and Lengyel, Once activated, RNase L degrades viral and cellular single-stranded RNAs Williams and Fish, In IFN-treated mouse L cells, Rutherford et al.

Similarly, in the present experiments, three transcripts of 1. The most represented mRNA in the seminiferous tubule somatic cells appears to be by far the 1.

The same pattern was found in peritubular cells, except that no constitutive expression was observed Table I. The second IFN-induced ds RNA-dependent enzyme that we studied was PKR. The autophosphorylation of PKR, in the presence of ds RNA or others polyanions confers to this protein the ability to phosphorylate other substrates, most prominently the α subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 eIF2α; Galabru and Hovanessian, Phosphorylation of eIF2α in turn inhibits viral protein production and, thereby, greatly reduces production of new virus particles O'Malley et al.

PKR protein and mRNA were never detected in meiotic and post-meiotic germ cells. In contrast, Sertoli and peritubular cells constitutively express PKR, and this expression was stimulated by IFNs Table I. Sendai virus exposure highly increased PKR mRNA levels but seemed to have no effect on the protein activity, as detected by our in vitro autophosphorylation experiments.

There are at least two possible explanations for the latter results, that are not exclusive: the Sendai virus could possibly catalyze the activation of PKR within the cells, which would normally lead to an in vivo autophosphorylation of this protein that cannot occur or be detected in our in vitro system; it is also possible that the Sendai virus can inhibit PKR activation, like other viruses previously described Polyack et al.

To our knowledge nothing is presently known about the abilities of Sendai virus to inhibit PKR. The last proteins studied here were of the Mx family. The IFN-regulated Mx gene has been shown to mediate selective resistance to Influenza virus in mice Staeheli and Haller, Meier et al. Mx1 is a nuclear protein that inhibits both Influenza virus and VSV, whereas Mx2 and Mx3 are cytoplasmic proteins, inhibiting VSV Mx2 or devoid of antiviral activity Mx3.

Our study reveals that Sertoli cells constitutively express relatively low levels of Mx2 and Mx3, but no Mx1. The latter protein appeared only after IFN α, IFN γ or Sendai virus stimulation, while Mx2 and Mx3 mRNAs and proteins were increased by these three stimuli Table I.

To our knowledge, this is the first time that Mx proteins are found to be constitutively expressed in a cell type and to display differential patterns of expression between themselves, after exposure to various stimuli. Moreover, IFN γ, which usually has no effect on Mx protein regulation, is able in Sertoli cells to induce Mx1 expression and to stimulate Mx2 and Mx3 expression.

In contrast to what was observed in Sertoli cells, no Mx protein or mRNA was detected in basal peritubular cells or after IFN γ treatment. However, Mx1, Mx2, and Mx3 were also found in peritubular cells after IFN α or Sendai virus exposure but displayed different patterns of expression to those seen in Sertoli cells.

However, the results obtained by these authors cannot really be interpreted as the nature of the cells and of the cell line used was not indicated. In the present study, the incubation time of the cells with the virus was long enough 28 h to allow the synthesis of IFNs by the virus-stimulated cells and to allow, in turn, the IFNs produced to induce the synthesis of the proteins of interest.

At present, we do not know why more pronounced effects of the Sendai virus were always observed on IFN-induced protein synthesis, comparatively to the effects of rat recombinant IFN α. Furthermore, the highest concentrations of recombinant IFN α used here were chosen to match the concentrations of type I IFN produced by peritubular and Sertoli cells, in response to high concentrations of Sendai virus Dejucq et al.

However, it cannot be excluded that the Sendai virus induced—IFNs represent a mixture of several type I IFNs that is more efficient than the rat recombinant IFN α protein used alone.

In favor of this last hypothesis is the fact that the pattern of expression of peritubular and Sertoli cells' Mx proteins after viral stimulation is the opposite of that observed after IFN α stimulation. A major fact emerges from the present study: the seminiferous tubules are very well equipped to react to a viral attack, and this potential antiviral defense system is assumed solely by peritubular and Sertoli cells, since pachytene spermatocytes and early spermatids lack the three major IFN-induced antiviral proteins studied.

These latter germ cell types were also previously shown to be unable or only marginally able to produce type I IFN in response to a Sendai virus exposure Dejucq et al. We therefore hypothetize that these differential and complementary patterns of expression between the cells bordering the tubules and Sertoli cells generate a much higher efficiency in the tubule antiviral defense system than if the pattern of expression were identical in both cell types.

Most interestingly, the cellular support of this potential antiviral defense system is strictly coincident to the tubular blood testis barrier, which, in rodents, is also assumed by peritubular and Sertoli cells Ploën and Setchell, Therefore, from the data presented here, it appears that the concept of the existence of a specific intratubular microenvironment, so far applied to the nutrition, regulation, and immune protection of the meiotic and post-meiotic germ cells, can also be extended to the germ cell antiviral defense.

As in the tubules, IFN γ was previously found to be produced by early spermatids Dejucq et al. It remains to be elucidated in which infectious states this overall potential antiviral defense system is operational in situ, as it is known that some viruses are able to overcome this system and to alter spermatogenesis and thereby possibly contaminate spermatozoa and semen.

We thank Anne-Marie Touzalin for technical assistance in preparing germ cells, Marie-Odile Liénard, Laurence Fornari, and Christiane Legouëvec for their help with the preparation of the manuscript and Louis Communier for the photography work.

We are also very grateful to Pr. Haller for advice in Mx search. This work was supported by Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medical, the Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de L'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, and Région Bretagne.

Dejucq was a recipient of a Conseil Régional de Bretagne fellowship. Hybridization of the blots with the actin probe is shown b and e. mRNA signals were quantified by scanning densitometry and corrected relative to actin signal for both peritubular cells c and Sertoli cells f.

Blots shown are representative of three totally independent culture and Northern blot experiments. Each activity value is the mean of at least three totally independent experiments. PKR mRNA expression in peritubular and Sertoli cells.

Hybridization of the blot with the actin probe is shown b and e. mRNA signals were quantified by scanning densitometry and corrected relative to actin signals for both peritubular c and Sertoli f cells. PKR activity tested in vitro on peritubular and Sertoli cell extracts. In vitro phosphorylation of PKR was performed after partial purification of the protein on poly rI —poly rC agarose, as described in Materials and Methods.

Products were then analyzed on a 7. The positive control is represented by murine 3T3 cells 3T3 , and the autoradiography shown is representative of three totally independent culture and Northern blot experiments.

Immunolocalization of PKR in peritubular and Sertoli cells. Cells were fixed after culture and permeabilized as described in Materials and Methods. Immunolocalization of PKR was performed using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against murine PKR and revealed using an avidin—biotin peroxydase complex amplification combination.

Strong cytoplasmic staining was observed in both control peritubular cells A and Sertoli cells C. Negative control for peritubular B and Sertoli cells D were performed using rabbit IgG at the dilution used for the PKR antibody.

Bar, 15 μm. Mx mRNA expression in peritubular and Sertoli cells. mRNA signals were quantified by scanning densitometry and corrected relative to actin signals for both peritubular c and Sertoli cells f. Expression of Mx proteins in peritubular and Sertoli cells. Mx proteins were detected by immunoprecipitation.

The positive and negative controls are represented by 3T3 cells transfected with the rat Mx1cDNA 3T3Mx1 and by 3T3 cells transfected with a plasmid lacking the MX1cDNA 3T3Neo , respectively.

Blots shown are representative of three totally independent culture and immunoprecipitation experiments. Immunolocalization of Mx proteins in peritubular and in Sertoli cells. No staining was observed in either control peritubular cells B or Sertoli cells D.

Sign In or Create an Account. Search Dropdown Menu. header search search input Search input auto suggest. filter your search All Content All Journals Journal of Cell Biology.

Advanced Search. User Tools Dropdown. Sign In. Skip Nav Destination Article Navigation. Article November 17 This Site. Google Scholar. Suzanne Chousterman , Suzanne Chousterman.

Bernard Jégou Bernard Jégou. Author and Article Information. Nathalie Dejucq. Suzanne Chousterman.

Phages and their bacterial Antjviral together constitute a vast and diverse ecosystem. Ativiral the Antiviral defense system of phages, Caloric needs for optimal performance Antiviral defense system evolved ddfense wide range Energy-boosting supplements antiviral mechanisms, and sstem in turn have adopted multiple tactics to circumvent or subvert these mechanisms to survive. An in-depth investigation into the interaction between phages and bacteria not only provides new insight into the ancient coevolutionary conflict between them but also produces precision biotechnological tools based on anti-phage systems. Moreover, a more complete understanding of their interaction is also critical for the phage-based antibacterial measures. Compared to the bacterial antiviral mechanisms, studies into counter-defense strategies adopted by phages have been a little slow, but have also achieved important advances in recent years.

Antiviral defense system -

Several mechanisms block this stage of the viral life cycle [ ]. As a rule, such mechanisms are encoded by prophages and underlie the phenomenon of superinfection exclusion Sie — prevention of secondary infection with homoimmune phages after the primary infection or lysogenisation is established [ ].

Membrane-associated Sie proteins can block phage DNA entry by targeting phage tape measure protein, like in the case of Streptococcus thermophilus phage TP-J 34 lipoprotein [ , ] or E.

coli phage HK97 gp15 [ , ]. Phage T4 Sp protein is known to inhibit T4 lysozyme, required for degradation of the cell wall peptidoglycan layer in E. coli [ ]. Host proteins required for phage DNA translocation are thought to be other targets for Sie, like the phage T4 Imm protein [ , ] or mycobacteriophage Fruitloop gp52 protein that interacts with the host Wag31 and inhibits infection by the Wagdependent phages [ ].

Sie systems with unknown targets were described for Lactococcus lactis phage Tuc [ ], S. enterica phage P22 [ ], V. cholerae phage K [ ], E. coli phage P1 [ ] and P. aeruginosa B3-like phages [ ]. Although Sie systems are considered primarily as a means of competition between phages [ ], they provide benefits for the host and can eventually become an integral part of the chromosome, like in the case with protein DicB encoded by the cryptic prophage Qin in E.

Once the phage genome is inside the cell it can be targeted by a variety of enzymes that cause its degradation. Most often the function of incoming DNA degradation is performed by innate and adaptive immunity systems. Modification module is responsible for epigenomic labeling of the host DNA, while the non-labeled phage DNA is a subject of endonucleolytic cleavage executed by the restriction module [ , ].

The general principle of R-M mechanism is depicted in Fig. In addition to the classical R-M, there is a plethora of defense systems encoding modification module, however, their mechanisms of restriction of foreign genetic material have not yet been determined.

Principle of classical R-M systems. MTase from the Type I-III systems modifies specific motives in the host DNA, while non-methylated sites in the foreign DNA are cleaved by REase. Type IV REase lacks cognate MTase and cleaves DNA modified by the viral MTase.

Classical R-M systems. R-M systems were discovered in the early s while deciphering the phenomenon of host-controlled viral modification [ , ].

They were extensively studied during the early years of molecular biology, culminating in wide applications and rise of the recombinant DNA technologies [ ]. The functional subunits of R-M systems include methyltransferase MTase that transfers methyl group from the S-adenosyl methionine SAM donor molecule to cytosine or adenine in DNA, and cognate restriction endonuclease REase.

Some systems also encode translocase that utilizes the energy of ATP hydrolysis for motor functions, and has a specificity subunit containing target recognition domains TRD that define REase and MTase sequence specificity. Based on the subunit composition, co-factors requirement, and the mode of action, R-M systems are divided into 4 types.

However, this classification does not reflect their evolutionary relationship [ , ]. Subunit composition for the modification and restriction complexes, some recognition sites, and cleavage patterns of the Type I-IV R-M systems are presented in Fig.

Functional subunits, recognition sites, composition of modification and restriction complexes for the representative members of Type I-IV R-M systems. Type II R-M usually recognize palindromic sites and both DNA strands within or in close proximity to the non-methylated sites are cleaved; Type I R-M systems modify both strands of the bipartite asymmetric DNA sites, cleavage requires interaction of two restriction complexes bound to non-methylated sites, achieved through ATP-dependent DNA looping, and occurs at non-fixed position in between; Type III R-M systems modify only one strand of the asymmetric recognition sites, cleavage occurs at a fixed position from one recognition site, when the restriction complex bound to the non-methylated site interacts with other complex that was activated by recognition of the nearby non-methylated site in the inverted repeat orientation; Type IV R-M systems lack modification module and cleave DNA after recognition of the modified sites.

Dashed line indicate that the subunit could be dispensable for the depicted activity. Type II R-M is the most studied group. Systems of this type normally comprise separate MTase and REase proteins.

MTase is monomeric, while REase acts as a homodimer. Typically, both cognate enzymes recognize the same specific bp long palindromic DNA site. MTase efficiently methylates non-methylated sites and hemi-methylated sites that are produced after DNA replication of fully methylated DNA, while REase has low binding affinity to the methylated and hemi-methylated sites [ ].

In addition to the described simple mode of action characteristic for the IIP subtype, enzymes of other subtypes could display unusual features [ ]. For example, the Type IIA, IIS, and IIL enzymes recognize asymmetric sequences; the REase and MTase polypeptides in the Type IIC and IIL are fused; while the Type IIE and IIF REases require binding to two sites for cleavage.

The IIL and IIG subtypes enzymes e. The second strand of the Eco sites is methylated by an additional methyltransferase [ ].

It is not clear how post-replicational cleavage of the non-methylated sites in IIL systems is avoided. Excessive REase expression is toxic to the cell, while the excess of MTase can lead to methylation of incoming phage genomes and restriction evasion.

The type I R-M systems encode MTase HsdM , REase HsdR , and specificity subunit HsdS and the most studied example of this kind of system is EcoKI. These enzymes function as HsdM 2 -HsdS 1 -HsdR 2 complexes, which can perform both restriction and methylation activities, while methylation also can be performed by the HsdM 2 -HsdS 1 or HsdM 2 -HsdS 1 -HsdR 1 complexes [ - ].

The mechanistic model of restriction activity is quite comprehensive: after recognition of a non-methylated site by the restriction complex, the ATPase motor function of the HsdR subunit is activated and the complex pulls on the bound DNA in both directions creating loops [ ].

Translocation consumes about 3 ATP molecules per nucleotide [ ]. Cleavage occurs when 2 restriction complexes anchored on the different sites collide or when a roadblock a replication fork or a supercoiled region is encountered by one of the complexes [ ].

Positions of the DNA cleavage are not fixed and it usually occurs between 2 neighboring recognition sites [ ]. SAM is required not only as a donor of methyl groups but also as a cofactor for the restriction complex.

Enzymes of the Type ISP subclass represent single polypeptide combining methylation and restriction activities, and methylate only one DNA strand [ , ]. To lower the risks of the host DNA damage, activity of the Type I complexes can be additionally controlled, for example, by the ClpXP-mediated proteolytic cleavage of the HsdR subunit, the phenomenon that is known as restriction alleviation [ , ].

The type I enzymes are known to alter sequence specificity through phase variation of their TRD domains [ ]. The type III R-M systems in many aspects are similar to the Type I [ ]. They function as multiprotein complexes consisting of Mod and Res subunits.

DNA modification is performed by the Mod 2 homodimer, while Res 2 -Mod 2 or Res 1 -Mod 2 complexes serve as ATP- and SAM-dependent REases [ , ]. The type III enzymes recognize short non-palindromic DNA sequences and methylate only one DNA strand. Thus, similar to the Type ISP enzymes, half of their hemi-methylated sites become non-methylated after replication.

Recognition of the non-methylated DNA site activates translocase activity of the Res subunit, but in contrast to the Type I enzymes, it consumes much less ATP and instead of bidirectional looping triggers one-dimensional diffusion along the DNA [ , ].

Cleavage occurs at a fixed position from one of the recognition sites, when the activated restriction complex interacts with another complex bound to the non-methylated site. Expression of the Mod subunit can be regulated through phase variation [ ]. To avoid cleavage by the host REases, phages can incorporate modified bases into their genome [ ] and the Type IV R-M systems evolved in response to specifically target modified DNA [ , ].

This is a divergent and poorly studied group of the solitary REase proteins that lack cognate Mtase. The subtype IIM enzymes also recognize methylated bases and are considered as Type IV by some authors [ ].

The type IV REase usually have broad sequence specificity and can target methylcytosines McrA , methyladenines Mrr , or phosphorothioated DNA ScoMcrA [ - ]. Some enzymes of this group require ATP or GTP hydrolysis and more than one site for cleavage McrBC or SauUSI [ , ].

Abundance of these proteins and their ecological importance is likely underestimated. In addition to their role in phage resistance and HGT control, R-M systems influence other biological processes [ ]. For example, MTase genes are often found without the cognate REase genes and such orphan enzymes are thought to be involved in regulation of gene expression or replication.

The best characterized examples include the Dam MTase in E. coli and CcrM in Caulobacter crescentus [ , ]. The R-M systems may be considered as selfish TA elements, since the loss of an MTase gene can lead to post-segregational killing associated with DNA damage elicited by the REase [ ].

The evolutionary and ecological roles of R-M systems have been addressed in several reviews [ 76 , - ]. Phage growth limitation Pgl system. Pgl could represent a unique example of the reverse mode of action to the R-M systems, where the modified DNA is restricted, but unlike in the case of the Type IV R-M systems, modification of the phage genome is carried out by the host defense system itself.

It was suggested that the initially released phages bore Pgl-specific modifications. The Pgl system has been found only in Actinomyces. It is assumed that such altruistic behavior could be afforded by multicellular bacteria that sacrifice one compartment for the protection of the whole mycelium.

The Pgl phenotype has an additional benefit: in the case of classical R-M systems erroneous methylation of the phage genome often leads to the emergence of the protected phage progeny, which would be able to wipe out the bacterial population.

In contrast, the reverse mode of action characteristic of Pgl ensures that no escaper phages can emerge in the course of infection Fig. Modification can be lost only after phage passage through the R-M deficient cells RM—. The Pgl system encodes 4 components: PglX — an adenine-methyltransferase, PglY — an ATPase, PglW — a protein kinase; and PglZ — an alkaline phosphatase Fig.

All four proteins are required for defense and activity of the first three components has been demonstrated in vitro [ ]. Deletion of the pglZ gene is impossible in the presence of functional pglX.

Thus, it was suggested that the proteins encoded by these genes form a TA pair and that PglX plays a critical role in restriction, when its activity is unrestrained by PlgZ [ ]. The mechanisms of phage infection sensing by the Pgl system and of the restriction module functioning have not been determined yet.

BacteRiophage EXclusion systems BREX. Global analysis of the pglZ gene distribution in the defense islands has shown that it could be found not only in Actinomyces , and also it could be often embedded in the conserved gene clusters distinct from the Pgl [ 18 ].

It was assumed that these pglZ -containing clusters represent a novel superfamily of phage defense systems denoted BREX [ ]. Based on the composition of components, the BREX systems have been classified into 6 types, and Pgl has been assigned to the Type II BREX Fig. Besides the presence of PglZ, the common feature of all BREX systems is the presence of ATPase and methyltransferase.

In the Type IV systems, the latter is replaced by a PAPS reductase, an enzyme that can be involved in DNA phosphorothioation [ ].

The most prevalent is the Type I BREX and systems of this type have been experimentally investigated in B. subtilis , E. coli , and V. cholerae where it has been found in the SXT conjugative elements [ , , ].

Activity of the BREX methyltransferase has also been demonstrated in Lactobacillus casei [ ]. The core components of Type 1 BREX systems include BrxX PglX , an adenine-specific methyltransferase, BrxZ PglZ , an alkaline phosphatase, BrxC, an ATPase, BrxL, a Lon-like protease, and small protein of unknown function BrxB.

These predicted activities have not been verified in vitro and some large domains of the BREX proteins have not been assigned a function yet.

Additional small proteins that are presumably playing a regulatory role or are required to confer protection from the specific phages also could be present i. a Functional characteristics of subunits in different types of BREX and DISARM systems. Order of components on the scheme do not always reflect actual organisation of genes in the operons.

b PT modification-based systems and phosphorothioate modification of the DNA backbone; due to the transient nature of PT modification, only small proportion of the sites are actually modified in the genome, Dnd motifs could remain hemi-modified. BREX sites are non-palindromic and are methylated only at one strand, which, similar to the Type III and ISP R-M systems, might imply the requirement of multiple sites and their specific orientation for restriction.

Yet, the mechanisms of restriction remain unknown. The E. coli BREX defense is suppressed by the phage T7 DNA mimic protein Ocr [ 46 ], which is a well-known Type I R-M systems inhibitor [ , , ].

This result seems to suggest common mechanistic features between the BREX and multisubunit complexes of R-M systems. Defense Island System Associated with Restriction—Modification DISARM systems.

Following the discovery of BREX, mining of the conserved gene clusters in the defense islands resulted in prediction of another novel system — DISARM [ ]. Antiviral activity was demonstrated for the DISARM system from B.

It comprises five components: the DrmA helicase, the DrmB protein with unknown function domain DUF, DrmC, containing a phospholipase D PLD domain, DrmE, and cytosine-specific methyltransferase DrmMII [ ]. This composition is typical for the class 2 DISARM, while in more abundant class 1 DrmMII is substituted with DrmMI, an adenine-methyltransferase, and DrmE — with DrmD, a SNF-2 like helicase Fig.

The PLD domains can be involved in catalytic activity of nucleases [ ]. Yet, surprisingly, DrmC was shown to be dispensable for the DISARM-mediated defense against phages. DrmMII alone can methylate symmetric C C WGG sites in the host DNA and deletion of the methyltransferase gene in the presence of the full DISARM cluster is toxic to cells.

Similar to BREX, DISARM does not affect phage adsorption and inhibits early stages of infection by an unknown mechanism. Besides DNA methylation, 7-deazaguanine based modifications also can be coupled with the R-M like defense systems [ ]. Multiple enzymes are involved in generation of 7-deazaguanine, which usually serves as a precursor of the modified bases in tRNA.

Some prokaryotes encode additional biosynthetic gene clusters responsible for introduction of 7-deazaguanine in DNA [ ]. Such DPD systems from 7- d eaza p urine in D NA can consist of up to 10 components DpdA-K [ , ]. The R-M-like activity of the DPD system was suggested based on inhibition of transformation of the non-modified plasmid into the cells of Salmonella Montevideo carrying a dpd cluster [ ].

Activity of the DPD system against phage infection had not been demonstrated so far, and possible restriction mechanism remains unclear. Auxiliary DPD components include helicases, ParB-like NTPase, and PLD nuclease, which may be involved in the restriction of unmodified DNA.

Interestingly, similar 7-deazaguanine modification clusters have been identified in some viral genomes e. Phosphorothioate PT modification-based systems. While modifications discussed so far affected only nucleobases, the DNA sugar-phosphate backbone also can be subjected to modification.

Replacement of a non-bridging oxygen with a sulfur atom that leads to formation of the phosphorothioate internucleotide linkage — PT modification — could be associated with different defense systems in Bacteria and Archaea [ - ]. These systems are summarized in Fig.

Not all stages of the biochemical pathway involved in PT modification have been determined but it is known that cysteine serves as a donor of the sulfur atom that is transferred to DndC and next incorporated in an energy-dependent manner into the DNA that was preliminary nicked at specific sites by DndD [ , , ].

Recently, it was shown that the dnd genes could also be involved in the PT modification of RNA [ ]. On its own, the PT modification is thought to be involved in the maintenance of the redox homeostasis and control of gene expression [ ], but the Dnd modification module in Bacteria is often accompanied by the dndFGH restriction gene cluster [ ].

The most prominent feature of PT modification, which is quite distinct from the R-M methylation, is the fact that only a small proportion of available sites are modified and modification of each specific site is transient, which raises questions about the mechanisms of self-immunity avoidance [ , ].

Presence of Dam methylation affects distribution of the PT-modified sites, while does not affect their overall density [ ]. It was further suggested that PT modification specificity could be defined by the overall geometry of the DNA site, rather than its sequence [ ]. The PT modification has also been shown in Archaea, where, instead of the dndFGH , the restriction function is performed by the pbeABCD gene cluster [ ].

The dndCDEA-pbeABCD from Haloterrigena jeotgali was shown to provide antiviral defense, and restriction activity was dependent on the functionally active PT modification module, which is distinct from the dndFGH behavior [ ]. Accumulation of the viral DNA was not observed inside dndCDEA-pbeABCD infected cells, though its cleavage has not been demonstrated either.

The pbeABCD genes can be found as solitary or adjacent to the methyltransferase genes, which implies a possibility of exchange of modules between the different defense systems [ ]. Recently, another novel PT modification-based defense system has been discovered — SspABCD-SspE [ ].

The sspABCD genes are not homologous to dndABCDE but encode similar functional domains and perform PT modification of DNA, while SspE serves as a restriction component, inhibiting phage infection.

In vitro , SspE was shown to possess an NTPase activity, which was stimulated by the presence of PT-modified sites, and non-specific nicking endonuclease activity [ ].

The feature of the SspABCD system is modification of only one DNA strand within non-palindromic recognition sites. Description of other prokaryotic defense strategies, and discussion of the interplay between different antiviral systems will be continued in the second part of the manuscript [Biochemistry Moscow , vol.

Clokie, M. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Díaz-Muñoz, S. Batinovic, S. Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar.

Wommack, K. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Parikka, K. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Rodriguez-Valera, F. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Breitbart, M. Brüssow, H. Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar.

Chiang, Y. Lang, A. Keen, E. V, Malagon, F. Koonin, E. Direct , 12 , Article CAS Google Scholar. Szathmáry, E. Krupovic, M. Galperin, M. New computational approaches for functional genomics, Nat.

Shmakov, S. Makarova, K. V Defense islands in bacterial and archaeal genomes and prediction of novel defense systems, J.

Oliveira, P. Doron, S. Gao, L. Eraslan, G. Eitzinger, S. Gussow, A. Kronheim, S. Fillol-Salom, A. Roberts, R. Akarsu, H. Zhang, F. Pourcel, C. CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Zhang, Y. Mendler, K. Howard-Varona, C. Ghosh, S. Qimron, U. USA , , Maynard, N.

Bohm, K. Piya, D. Rousset, F. coli identify essential genes and phage host factors, PLoS Genet. Kortright, K. Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar. Mutalik, V. coli , PLoS Biol. Luria, S. Isaev, A. Pinilla-Redondo, R. Samson, J. Hwang, S. Article Google Scholar. Hampton, H.

Bertozzi Silva, J. Dowah, A. Stone, E. Dragoš, A. Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar. Hansen, M. Lo, Røder, H. Abedon, S.

Fernández, L. Henriksen, K. aeruginosa flow-cell biofilms are enhanced by repeated phage treatments but can be eradicated by phage-ciprofloxacin combination, Pathog. Hosseinidoust, Z. Bull, J. Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar.

Tan, D. Vidakovic, L. Scanlan, P. Wilkinson, B. Kim, M. Reyes-Robles, T. Manning, A. Tzipilevich, E. Betts, A. CAS Google Scholar. Braun, V. Chatterjee, S. coli receptor, LamB, Viruses , 4 , Kulikov, E. Moller, A.

Wright, R. Christen, M. Bikard, D. Van Houte, S. Riede, I. Harvey, H. Fallico, V. Power, P. Turkington, C. Seed, K. Komano, T. Brouwer, M. Porter, N. Quemin, E.

Hartman, R. Deng, L. Asheshov, I. The HNH nuclease domain can also be found in Cas9 of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Cap5 can be found in an open or ajar configuration.

The mobile nature of the SAVED domains allows for the structure to reorganize near the active site of one or both HNH domains, thus activating the domains for DNA degradation. The proposed Back-to-Front stacking mechanism of the SAVED domains appears to be the key to activating DNA degradation in the CdnG-Cap5 defense system.

Additionally, Back-to-Front stacking may have the potential for SAVED domain-containing effectors to form oligomers. Because the SAVED domain is such a large protein family, Back-to-Front stacking is likely a conserved mechanism that can be applied to other CBASS systems. Skip to main content.

Researchers explore the molecular mechanisms of a promising antiviral defense system. No staining was observed in either control peritubular cells B or Sertoli cells D. Sign In or Create an Account. Search Dropdown Menu. header search search input Search input auto suggest.

filter your search All Content All Journals Journal of Cell Biology. Advanced Search. User Tools Dropdown. Sign In. Skip Nav Destination Article Navigation. Article November 17 This Site. Google Scholar. Suzanne Chousterman , Suzanne Chousterman. Bernard Jégou Bernard Jégou.

Author and Article Information. Nathalie Dejucq. Suzanne Chousterman. Bernard Jégou. Received: May 07 Revision Received: September 02 Online ISSN: J Cell Biol 4 : — Article history Received:. Revision Received:. Cite Icon Cite.

toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu. toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest. ds double stranded. HIV human immunodeficiency virus. IFN interferon. PKR RNA-activated protein kinase. Sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus: virus entry into the male and female genital tract.

HIV-particles in spermatozoa of patients with AIDS and their transfer into the oocyte. Search ADS. Evaluation of age-related effects on the antiviral activity of interferon and induction of A synthetases in testicular cell cultures derived from swine of various ages.

Alkaline phosphatase histochemistry discriminates peritubular cells in primary rat testicular cell culture. A full-length murine A synthetase cDNA transfected in NIH-3T3 cells impairs EMCV but not VSV replication. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to hogh specific.

Identification of double stranded RNA-binding domains in the interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated p68 kinase. Autophosphorylation of the protein kinase dependent on double-stranded RNA. Pure Sertoli cell cultures: a new model for the study of somatic-germ cell interactions.

Regulation of the interferon-inducible IFI K gene, the human equivalent of the murine Mx gene, by interferons, double-stranded RNA, certain cytokines, and viruses. Interferon expression in the testes of transgenic mice leads to sterility. Organization of the murine Mx gene and characterization of its interferon- and virus-inducible promoter.

Male sterility of transgenic mice carrying exogenous mouse interferon-β gene under the control of the metallothionein enhancer - promoter. Distribution of hepatitis B virus in testicle tissue in patients with hepatitis B infection.

Monoclonal antibodies to an interferon-induced Mr 68, protein and their use for the detection of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase in human cells. Detection of plus and minus strand hepatitis C virus RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and spermatid. A family of interferon-induced Mx-related mRNAs encodes cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins in rat cells.

Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding rat PKR, the double-stranded RNA-dependent eukaryotic initiation factor-2 kinase. Inflammation of the testis, epididymis, peritesticular membranes and scrotum.

HIV-1 nucleic acids localize to the spermatogonia and their progeny. A study by polymerase chain reaction in situ hybridization. Detection of activated double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase in 3T3-FA cells. Germ cell-conditionned medium contains multiple factors that modulate the secretion of testins, clusterin, and transferrin by Sertoli cells.

The P58 cellular inhibitor complexes with the interferon-induced double stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR, to regulate its autophosphorylation and activity. The murine A synthase locus: three distinct transcripts from linked genes.

Antiviral actions of interferon. Interferon-regulated cellular proteins and their surprisingly selective antiviral activities. Testicular peritubular cells secrete a protein under androgen control that modulates Sertoli cell functions. Interferon-induced human protein with homology to protein Mx of influenza virus-resistant mice.

Interferon induced Mx protein: a mediator of cellular resistance to influenza virus. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to the interferon-inducible protein Mx of influenza virus-resistant mice.

Mx protein: constitutive expression in 3T3 cells transformed with cloned Mx cDNA confers selective resistance to Influenza virus. Male reproductive health and environmental chemicals with estrogenic effects. Williams, B. Interferons and viruses: in vitro studies.

In Interferons: Their Impact in Biology and Medicine. Taylor-Papadimitriou, editor. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Figure 1. View large Download slide. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. View Large. Materials And Methods. Abbreviations used in this paper.

Volume , Issue 4. Previous Article Next Article.

Energy-boosting supplements be best Antivrial to our website, please sustem your browser Antiviral defense system updated to the following: Google Chrome v PADS Arsenal Decense Database of Prokaryotic Defense Energy-boosting supplements Related Genes. Toggle navigation. Home Browse Search Analysis Annotation PAV Download Statistics FAQ Contact Version 1. PADS Prokaryotic Antiviral Defense System Arsenal is a database of prokaryotic antiviral defense systems related genes, which archived genes that are associated with 18 distinctive categories of defense systems. It is dedicated to gathering, storing, analyzing and visualizing prokaryotic defense gene datasets. Antiviral defense system

Author: Arashir

5 thoughts on “Antiviral defense system

Leave a comment

Yours email will be published. Important fields a marked *

Design by ThemesDNA.com